| Peer-Reviewed

Challenges Faced by the Public Elementary School Teachers in Conducting Action Research

Received: 18 January 2023    Accepted: 17 February 2023    Published: 4 March 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Many teachers in the Department of Education (DepEd), both elementary and secondary schools, continue to be uninterested in conducting action research despite the DepEd's efforts to update and inform the public-school teachers of the importance of doing research. Furthermore, the said teachers also have a deficiency in their practical knowledge, resources, and skills in conducting action research. The shortcomings of these teachers need to be addressed because they are integral to resolving classroom issues and improving teaching skills leading to the better academic performance of learners. Therefore, this study explored the challenges faced by the public school teachers of Talisayan District, Division of Misamis Oriental in conducting action research during the school year 2020-2021. It focused on the following action research processes that teachers undergo in the conduct of action research such as selecting a focus/problem identification; clarifying theories; identifying research questions; collecting data; and analyzing data. The challenges encountered by the teachers were also identified as the basis for crafting the offered recommendations. The qualitative phenomenological method of research was used in the study. There were 16 participants who were purposively chosen. The semi-structured interview guide questions were utilized as the data-gathering tool. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Generally, findings revealed that the teacher participants experienced the following in conducting their action research namely: struggling during the initial stage, the feeling of rejection, the complexity of demands, constraints with set priorities, difficulties in recognizing relevant theories, inadequate background knowledge on theories, lack of skills in the formulation of objectives, demonstrating low-spiritedness, lack of methods and techniques, falling short of pre-notification process, and inadequate skills in data analysis.

Published in Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies (Volume 8, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.tecs.20230801.13
Page(s) 14-22
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Challenges Faced, Conducting Action Research, Phenomenological Method

References
[1] Abelardo L. J., Lomboy, M. A. A., and Lopez, C. C., Balaria, F. E., Subia, G. S. (2019). Challenges Encountered by the National High School Teachers in Doing Action Research. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences (IJELS), 4 (4). Retrieved from http://journal-repository.co/index.php/ijels/article/view/7.
[2] Archibald M. Munce S. (2015). Challenges and Strategies in the Recruitment of Participants for Qualitative Research. University of Alberta Health Sciences Journal. 11 (1), 34-37, 2015.
[3] Binayao, B. S. & Dales, Z. I. (2020). A Phenomenological Study of the Passers and Non-Passers in Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET). International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, volume 5, issue 8. doi 10.38124/IJISRT20AUG828.
[4] Biruk (2013). Benefits and Challenges of Doing Research of Doing Research in Sululta Secondary School in Ethiopia.
[5] Borg, S. (2014). Teacher research for professional development. In G. Pickering & P. Gunashekar (Eds.), Innovation in English language teacher education (pp. 23-28).
[6] Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge.
[7] Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
[8] Dame, Abera. (2011). Action research in Selected Teacher Education Colleges of Oromia: Knowledge base, practice and Challenges. The Ethiopian Journal of Education, 31 (2), 33-62.
[9] DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017, Research Management Guidlines.
[10] DepEd Order No. 13, s. 2015, Establishment of a Policy Development Process at the Department of Education.
[11] DepEd Order No. 43, s. 2015, Revised Guidelines for the Basic Education Research Fund (BERF).
[12] DepEd Order No. 39, s. 2016, Adoption of the Basic Education Research Agenda.
[13] Ellis, N. & Loughland, T. (2016). The Challenges of Practitioner Research: A Comparative Study of Singapore and NSW. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 41 (2). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n2.8.
[14] Fathelrahman Al (2015). Rejection of Good Manuscripts: Possible Reasons, Consequences and Solutions. J Clinic Res Bioeth 6: 204. doi: 10.4172/2155-9627.1000204.
[15] Hine, G. S. C. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs. In special issue: Teaching and learning in higher education: Western Australia’s TL Forum. Issues in Educational Research, 23 (2), 151-63. http://www.iier.or.au/ iier23/hine.html.
[16] Hong, C. and Lawrence, S. (2011). Action Research in Teacher Education: Classroom Inquiry, Data-Driven Decision Making. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 4 (2), 1-17.
[17] Hoskins and White (2013). Relational Inquiries and the Research Interview Mentoring Future Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative studies in Education, 24, 1-17.
[18] Johnson, C. (2011). School Administrators and Importance of utilizing Action Research. International Journal of Humanities and Social science, 14 (1), 78-84.
[19] Khadilkar, Suvarna Satish. (2018). Rejection Blues Why Do Research Papers Get Rejected. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. 6 (4) 239-241.
[20] Khankeh et al. (2015). Challenges in Conducting Qualitative Research in Health: A Conceptual Paper. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. Wolters Kluwer-Medknow Publications.
[21] Kukari, A. and Honan, E. (2010). Development of Quality Teaching through Action Research. Spotlight with NRI, Development Issues, Policies, and Trends, 4 (3).
[22] Kutlay, N. (2013). A survey of English language teachers’ views of research. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 188-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.055.
[23] Mahani, S. (2012). Enhancing the quality of teaching and learning through action research. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 9 (3), 209-215. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v9i3.7086.
[24] Morales, M. P. E. (2016). Participatory action research (PAR) cum action research (AR) in teacher professional development: A literature review. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2 (1), 156-165. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105165
[25] Norasmah, O. & Chia S. Y. (2016). The Challenges of Action Research Implementation in Malaysian Schools. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities. 24 (1), 43-52, 2016.
[26] Othman, N. (2011). Research Methodology. Centre for Graduate Studies INSANIAH University College, Kedah Malaysia.
[27] Pardede, P. (2018). Identifying and Formulating the Research Problem. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329179630.
[28] Ranjit, Kumar (2011. Research Methodology a step-by-step guide for beginners. SAGE Publications Ltd 1 Oliver’s Yard 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP.
[29] Rimando, M., Brace, A. M., Namageyo-Funa, A., Parr, T. L., Sealy, D., Davis, T. L., Martinez, L. M., & Christiana, R. W. (2015). Data Collection Challenges and Recommendations for Early Career Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 20 (12), 2025-2036. Retrieved.
[30] Sagor, Richard (2010). Guiding School Improvement with action research. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
[31] Salmons, Janet E. (2019). Find the theory in your research. Little Quick Fix. 222.
[32] Sandberg, J., Alvesson, M. (2020). Meanings of Theory: Clarifying Theory through Typification. Journal of Management Studies. Volume 58, Issue 2 / p. 487-516 2021 - Wiley Online Library.
[33] Sharon, T. (2018). 43 Ways to Find Participants for Research. Medium.com.
[34] Sheikh, A. S. F., Sheikh, S. A., Kaleem, A. & Waqas, A. (2013). Factors contributing to lack of interest in research among medical students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 4, 237-243. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S51536.
[35] Ulla, M. B. (2017). Teacher training in Myanmar: Teachers’ perceptions and implications. International Journal of Instruction, 10 (2), 103-118. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1138329.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Myla Fe Villahermosa Tingabngab, Bernadette Santos Binayao. (2023). Challenges Faced by the Public Elementary School Teachers in Conducting Action Research. Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies, 8(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20230801.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Myla Fe Villahermosa Tingabngab; Bernadette Santos Binayao. Challenges Faced by the Public Elementary School Teachers in Conducting Action Research. Teach. Educ. Curric. Stud. 2023, 8(1), 14-22. doi: 10.11648/j.tecs.20230801.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Myla Fe Villahermosa Tingabngab, Bernadette Santos Binayao. Challenges Faced by the Public Elementary School Teachers in Conducting Action Research. Teach Educ Curric Stud. 2023;8(1):14-22. doi: 10.11648/j.tecs.20230801.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.tecs.20230801.13,
      author = {Myla Fe Villahermosa Tingabngab and Bernadette Santos Binayao},
      title = {Challenges Faced by the Public Elementary School Teachers in Conducting Action Research},
      journal = {Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies},
      volume = {8},
      number = {1},
      pages = {14-22},
      doi = {10.11648/j.tecs.20230801.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20230801.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.tecs.20230801.13},
      abstract = {Many teachers in the Department of Education (DepEd), both elementary and secondary schools, continue to be uninterested in conducting action research despite the DepEd's efforts to update and inform the public-school teachers of the importance of doing research. Furthermore, the said teachers also have a deficiency in their practical knowledge, resources, and skills in conducting action research. The shortcomings of these teachers need to be addressed because they are integral to resolving classroom issues and improving teaching skills leading to the better academic performance of learners. Therefore, this study explored the challenges faced by the public school teachers of Talisayan District, Division of Misamis Oriental in conducting action research during the school year 2020-2021. It focused on the following action research processes that teachers undergo in the conduct of action research such as selecting a focus/problem identification; clarifying theories; identifying research questions; collecting data; and analyzing data. The challenges encountered by the teachers were also identified as the basis for crafting the offered recommendations. The qualitative phenomenological method of research was used in the study. There were 16 participants who were purposively chosen. The semi-structured interview guide questions were utilized as the data-gathering tool. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Generally, findings revealed that the teacher participants experienced the following in conducting their action research namely: struggling during the initial stage, the feeling of rejection, the complexity of demands, constraints with set priorities, difficulties in recognizing relevant theories, inadequate background knowledge on theories, lack of skills in the formulation of objectives, demonstrating low-spiritedness, lack of methods and techniques, falling short of pre-notification process, and inadequate skills in data analysis.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Challenges Faced by the Public Elementary School Teachers in Conducting Action Research
    AU  - Myla Fe Villahermosa Tingabngab
    AU  - Bernadette Santos Binayao
    Y1  - 2023/03/04
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20230801.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.tecs.20230801.13
    T2  - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies
    JF  - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies
    JO  - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies
    SP  - 14
    EP  - 22
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-4971
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20230801.13
    AB  - Many teachers in the Department of Education (DepEd), both elementary and secondary schools, continue to be uninterested in conducting action research despite the DepEd's efforts to update and inform the public-school teachers of the importance of doing research. Furthermore, the said teachers also have a deficiency in their practical knowledge, resources, and skills in conducting action research. The shortcomings of these teachers need to be addressed because they are integral to resolving classroom issues and improving teaching skills leading to the better academic performance of learners. Therefore, this study explored the challenges faced by the public school teachers of Talisayan District, Division of Misamis Oriental in conducting action research during the school year 2020-2021. It focused on the following action research processes that teachers undergo in the conduct of action research such as selecting a focus/problem identification; clarifying theories; identifying research questions; collecting data; and analyzing data. The challenges encountered by the teachers were also identified as the basis for crafting the offered recommendations. The qualitative phenomenological method of research was used in the study. There were 16 participants who were purposively chosen. The semi-structured interview guide questions were utilized as the data-gathering tool. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Generally, findings revealed that the teacher participants experienced the following in conducting their action research namely: struggling during the initial stage, the feeling of rejection, the complexity of demands, constraints with set priorities, difficulties in recognizing relevant theories, inadequate background knowledge on theories, lack of skills in the formulation of objectives, demonstrating low-spiritedness, lack of methods and techniques, falling short of pre-notification process, and inadequate skills in data analysis.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Education, Division of Misamis Oriental, Talisayan Municipality, Philippines

  • College of Education, Bukidnon State University, Malaybalay City, Bukidnon, Philippines

  • Sections